Friday, 16 August 2013



Here is the first appearance of the word 'Picturesque' in the title of a book published in English. At times the sensibility seems so modern: for instance when Gilpin describes his encounters with the casual guides at Tintern Abbey [p. 50], it brings to mind similar experiences I have had visiting historic ruins in developing countries. Here Gilpin shows us this hugely unequal economic relationship within his own country. This literally brings home the strange relationship of the tourist with the places they visit. 

Gilpin doesn't ignore the coming of industrialisation to this area either:

On the right side of the river, the bank forms a woody amphitheatre, following the course of the stream round the promontory. It's lower skirts are adorned with a hamlet; in the midst of which, volumes of thick smoke, thrown up at intervals, from an iron forge, as it's fires receive fresh fuel, add grandeur to the scene     
[p. 39, see also pp. 35-36]

At first I found his acceptance of this strange: because of the seeming modernity of his mind. One might imagine he would be outraged at the coming of industrialisation to this iconically Romantic scenic destination; but then Wordsworth has not yet written Lines Written a few Miles Above Tintern Abbey, On revisiting the Banks of the Wye during a Tour, July 1798 ; nor Turner painted Tintern Abbey: The TranseptGilpin is creating this place as a scenic destination and in 1770 he is only at the very beginning of the Industrial Revolution. Acceptance isn't strong enough because Gilpin embraces this evidence of industrialisation as an exciting innovation that has it's own sensational and pictorial possibilities. It is perhaps the desire to preserve a landscape from industry, or the effects of a particular industry upon the environment that are a mark of the modern mindset. 

Gilpin's impetus for travel is two fold; to enjoy novel sensations and experiences and to find landscape that will provide the raw materials for landscape paintings (the finished painting would be worked up in the studio). To me this replicates the spirit of Gilpin's time; merchants travel to foreign lands looking for raw materials that can be then brought back and manufactured into goods that are far more valuable. Here the rural offers a similar possibility, a colony of the metropolitan, perhaps. For Gilpin Nature itself is too irregular, untidy and unformed to be anything but the starting point. In taking people into the countryside to sketch Gilpin is one of the prime instigators of tourism within Britain (at a time when the Napoleonic Wars made wider travel more problematic). 



Roger Lougher has been investigating Landscape since 2005 when he began his MA in Documentary Photography. He is on the trail of landscape and language, doggedly trying to unravel their complex relationships. He has the curiosity of a three year child constantly asking ‘Why?’ This is not only an attention seeking device but a continuous challenge to himself. He wants to know why we see landscape the way we do. Why is that a perfect sunset? Why should a mouldering tower under a glowering sky make a great picture? Unlike a three year-old Roger Lougher answers his own question by creating new landscapes, through photogarphy, installations or discrete sculptural works. It is in there last manifestation that we see his work in Be Our Guest at Oriel Davies. (I couldn't resist including some of my fire exit signs from the same exhibition)















Domestic Landscape / Tirlun Cartrefol is an attempt to  answer some of these questions. Roger Lougher has taken text from the Rev William Gilpin’s ‘Observations on the River Wye...” and had it printed on tea-towels. It was in the title of this book that the word Picturesque was first used in the English. Influenced by the Sublime the Picturesque is less demanding of the tourist and lays out rules for what makes a landscape picture. Like a river a book travels in one direction. In his sculpture the artist offers the viewer the option of traveling the length of the river, with asides sited apart from the main sculpture.




Wednesday, 14 August 2013

Man-made burger as milestone in landscape



£200,000 test-tube burger marks milestone in future meat-eating

Project funded by anonymous individual aims to cut 
number of cattle farmed for food and reduce greenhouse 
gas emissions


• Could lab-grown meat solve food crisis?
• Artificial meat could slice emissions, say scientists

Lurking in a petri dish in a laboratory in the Netherlands
is an unlikely contender for the future of food. The yellow-
pink sliver the size of a corn plaster is the state-of-the-art 
in lab-grown meat, and a milestone on the path to the 
world's first burger made from stem cells.
Project funded by anonymous individual aims to cut number of cattle farmed for food and reduce greenhouse gas emissions


Dr Mark Post, head of physiology at Maastricht University, plans to unveil a complete burger – produced at a cost of more than £200,000 – this October.
He hopes Heston Blumenthal, the chef and owner of the three Michelin-starred Fat Duck restaurant in Berkshire, will cook the offering for a celebrity taster as yet unnamed.
The project, funded by a wealthy, anonymous, individual aims to slash the number of cattle farmed for food, and in doing so reduce one of the major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions.
"Meat demand is going to double in the next 40 years and right now we are using 70% of all our agricultural capacity to grow meat through livestock," Post said.
"You can easily calculate that we need alternatives. If you don't do anything meat will become a luxury food and be very, very expensive."
Lab meat graphicThe recipe for meat grown in the lab. Source: Guardian graphics
Livestock contribute to global warming through unchecked releases of methane, a gas 20 times more potent a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide.
At the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Vancouver, Post said the burger would be a "proof of concept" to demonstrate that "with in-vitro methods, out of stem cells we can make a product that looks like and feels and hopefully tastes like meat".
Post is focusing on making beef burgers from stem cells because cows are among the least efficient animals at converting the food they eat into food for humans.
"Cows and pigs have an efficiency rate of about 15%, which is pretty inefficient. Chickens are more efficient and fish even more," Post said. "If we can raise the efficiency from 15% to 50% it would be a tremendous leap forward."
Post and his team of six have so far grown thin sheets of cow muscle measuring 3cm long, 1.5cm wide, and half a millimetre thick. To make a burger will take 3,000 pieces of muscle and a few hundred pieces of fatty tissue, that will be minced together and pressed into a patty.
Each piece of muscle is made by extracting stem cells from cow muscle tissue and growing them in containers in the laboratory. The cells are grown in a culture medium containing foetal calf serum, which contains scores of nutrients the cells need to grow.
The slivers of muscle grow between pieces of Velcro and flex and contract as they develop. To make more protein in the cells – and so improve the texture of the tissue – the scientists shock them with an electric current.
Post said he could theoretically increase the number of burgers made from a single cow from 100 to 100m. "That means we could reduce the number of livestock we use by 1m," he said.
If lab-grown meat mimics farmed meat perfectly – and Post admits it may not – the meat could become a premium product just as free range and organic items have.
He said that in conversations with the Dutch Society of Vegetarians, the chairman estimated half its members would start to eat meat if he could guarantee that it cost fewer animal lives.
Meat grown in the laboratory could have several advantages, because its manufacture is controlled at each step. The tissue could be grown to produce high levels of healthy polyunsaturated fatty acids, or to have a particular texture.
Because the burgers are made from animal stem cells, researchers could make products from more exotic animals. "We could make panda meat, I'm sure we could," Post said.
He believes it will be a relatively simple matter to scale up the operation, since most of the technical obstacles have already been overcome. "I'd estimate that we could see mass production in another 10 to 20 years," he said.